avin_mehya

Yes client certificate is needed and the same has been installed in browser

Hi, While verifying scripts for one of our websites we are receiving X509 certificate is required error. We had few scripts which were recorded two months back and above error appears when verifying them. Moreover when we try to record new scripts then we are getting below error. This website works fine on browser.

Thanks a lot Sergei. Overwriting option works fine. But there are a lot of requests with similar request headers. So can this be set globally in the Default HTTP Headers at Profile level. Because there i dont see a dropdown of Overwrite.

Hi, We have a situation here where the request headers are identical barring just one difference with respect to content type. In the recorded request this happens to be application/json while during test the charset gets appended to the content-type. Response is returning an 500 Internal Server error as the method is throwing Null Pointer exception. This request with charset was posted through browser as well and it failed. I tried to add a request header with the below values so it would overwrite the automatically generated header. But that returns with content-type. Is there a way where we can send this request by isolating the charset part from the content-type. Recorded Request content-type: application/json Test Request content-type: application/json; charset=UTF-8

While recording a profile using "Website in Firefox browser" mode i am getting error stating "Cannot start recording. Error: the handle is invalid. [0x80070006]" While profiles get recorded on other browsers. Unsure as to what could be the reason.

I understood the difference...Its the same...But the unit was changed from seconds to milliseconds. I observed that now and hence the aggressive run.

In WAPT Pro 4.7, a part of Profile property was "User Think Time" while in WAPT Pro 5.0 the property is clubbed under Intra-session load volume options "Think time after page load". Are these two options same or is there a difference in their functioning? Because as i can understand the current option which is "Think time after page load" seems to be a more aggressive option while running bench-marking tests. We can always exercise the option to run tests with the time specified in page properties but they seem to be too slow. What kind of option can be used to get a common ground with the real world simulation?

I will elaborate a little bit more on our requirement. We have a page which displays different charts about activity across locations etc. There is a drop down for Currency and upon changing the same the charts get changed. The interim request calls during such a change are of Web sockets only. We need to get response time of such requests between the send and receive of web sockets.

Hi, We have an application which uses web sockets. I have recorded a profile using the web socket extension and upon execution i can see both the Send/Receive requests. My question is that is there a way to record response times of the same? Because upon checking the HTML generated reported there isnt any mention on timings of those web socket requests?

We are trying to achieve this using a Batch file. This batch file has been called inside WAPT using Javascript. Issue here is that the Batch file individually runs fine. Also the same runs perfectly fine inside the browser console. But when we run this through WAPT, this fails. Is there some step which we are missing? We have IE11 on WAPT machine and i presume that WAPT uses the same. Below is the Javascript code var myObject = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Shell"); var result = myObject.Run("D:\\welcome.bat"); log.message("Batch File executed successfully"); Welcome.bat file contains code to place files to a remote server.

This solution has worked. Thanks.

I have tried enabling plugin as well as reinstalled it a few times. Still i am facing this issue.

I am also facing a similar issue wherein Firefox plugin doesn't get installed. We are using WAPT Pro 4.3 and Firefox version is 52.0.1

Hi Team, We have been performing performance testing of our application UI using WAPT 4.3 We have few scenarios which involve a two part process: - First part involves FTP of a file - Second part takes place from UI where we process the file which was FTPed in first step Second step can be achieved using WAPT We wanted to understand by any chance can we also work upon the first step using WAPT. Thanks in advance.

Hi, Is it possible to customize the standard HTML reports? There is a lot of data which appears in the HTML reports which includes Summary Report, Performance Data etc. As per my understanding these reports are created on the basis of xsl defined in the WAPT Installation Path (\ReportTemplates) The current format is fine and the same includes enough data but we would want to make certain modifications as per our standard report. Few of the modifications which we would want to do are: -> Errors in all the profiles should be integrated as per the report. Currently these are as per profiles. Also in addition it should include the error code as well. For Example: Network Error can be a 10054 or 10061. -> We also want to include some Custom Graphs and rather than keeping graphs separately we wish to project them along with the data.

We have a testing scenario which consists of few profiles. During execution we receive few network errors in the response header either Network error: 10054 - "An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host." in the response header or Network error: 10060 - "A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond." As mentioned in this forum(http://www.loadtestingtool.com/forum/topic/45-failure-socket-error-10054/) we have tried playing around with the think time for all requests still we are getting these errors.(Set to as high as 15 seconds or Specified in Request) We have also checked with our network team to validate the load balancer configuration or drop of packets but that also is fine. Also this issue is not consistently observed, sometimes for 1000 users there wont be any network errors and on few runs there are around 30-40 network errors of 10054 code. We have checked logs on the IIS server and we do not get any failures on that end. We have also changed few other parameters i.e. work queue length, worker processes,connection setting on load balancer etc. but still we keep on getting these errors We have monitored CPU Utilization, Memory, I/O etc but there is nothing alarming even on that front. What could be the issue with the same. Is there a way to debug these errors as they give out very minimal details. Note: We are using WAPT Pro 3.5 with 2 load agents

Hi, We need to pass xml requests from csv file to test web services. We have added a new request(manually created) and we are trying to call the request by manually inputting headers. But we are getting 500 Internal Server Error. This same request works perfectly fine without WAPT. Help will be appreciated. Thanks

We have a lot of scenarios to record and most of the scenarios go upto 400 pages or even more. Also Page Names are set as Page URL's by default so the execution report finally is a lengthy one and its difficult to read because in most cases on the application under test URL's are appended with Invoice ID'S which is a very long one. Hence we are looking at setting Page Names in a more distinguishable good manner so it would reduce manual effort of changing page names one by one and add value to the final report.

Thanks a lot for your quick response. But in this case $Search would only work when i wish to set the title for the first page to the second page which would be incorrect. Is there any other way which would help set the Page Name as Title of the same page

Hi All, I am trying to use the HTML TITLE tag under HEAD to use under the Name property for each page. The same has to be used using JavaScript and once the script has been verified than all the Page names should get changed as per the Title tag. This will in turn help in easier viewing of the Report. And effort will be saved for each and every user entering individual page names. <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><title> ABC :: Log On </title> JavaScript can be accessed using var title = context.document.getElementsByTagName("title")[0].innerHTML; How can we access the internal Name property and set the same using variable created in Javascript