Avg90 response vs. Avg90 with images

[Guest Mark]

I must not be correctly understanding the difference between the graphed results for

"Avg 90% response time"

"Avg 90% response +image times"

While running my tests and examining the individual request Timing graph I always see the Avg90 line as a larger number than the Avg90 +images. It "seems to me" that the inverse should be true --- that if you add in the image display time then that number should always be greater. Could you please explain?

 

 

 

[Guest angela]

I must not be correctly understanding the difference between the graphed results for

"Avg 90% response time"

"Avg 90% response +image times"

While running my tests and examining the individual request Timing graph I always see the Avg90 line as a larger number than the Avg90 +images. It "seems to me" that the inverse should be true --- that if you add in the image display time then that number should always be greater. Could you please explain?

 

Hi Mark,

 

Could you please send to us the corresponding Reports? Thank you in advance.

 

[Guest Mark]

Hi Mark,

 

Could you please send to us the corresponding Reports? Thank you in advance.

 

 

Here is the graph.

PerformanceGraph.bmp

[Guest Trifonius]

Here is the graph.

I have the same question and looking for an explanation.

 

[sergei 0]

It was a bug. Please, download the latest build from http://www.loadtestingtool.com/forum/builds/WAPTPro1.0.zip